Sunday, October 17, 2010

Poverty in America: Why Don't We Take Care of the Poor in Our Own Country?

by JuJuBe (Joanna)

October 17 is the International Day for the Eradication of Poverty.
Some statistics about poverty in America

1 in 7 people in the United States are living in poverty.

43.6 million Americans were living BELOW POVERTY LEVEL in 2009. (including 15.5 million children and 3.4 million seniors) Up from 37 million in 2008.

14.9 million individuals are currently unemployed.

6.2 million people were jobless for 27 weeks or more as of August 2010.

The poverty threshold in 2009 was $10,956 for an individual and $21,954 for a family of four.

In 2008, 49.1 million Americans lived in food insecure households, 32.4 million adults and 16.7 million children.

In 2008, 4.1 percent of all U.S. households (4.8 million households) accessed emergency food from a food pantry one or more times.

Usually when we think about poverty, the image that comes to mind is that of a child with a swollen belly in a "third world" country living in a community without running water and proper sewage disposal. We tend to forget that there are people in America, supposedly the most prosperous country in the world, living in poverty.

We tend to dismiss the poor in America by blaming their situation on a lack of motivation, pure laziness. We have an image of a "welfare queen" bilking the system and living in the lap of luxury at tax payer expense. We do not believe that in a nation with so much wealth, there are people starving, people without a place to lay their heads at night, people who are struggling to put clothes on the backs of their children and food in their bellies.

Americans want to believe in the inherent laziness of the poor. We do not want to believe that this is NOT the "land of opportunity" we have touted it to be. We neglect the discrepancies in job and educational opportunities available to our fellow country men. We want to ignore the fact that despite all of their efforts, some Americans are simply not afforded the same chances in life as others. We want to "blame the victim".

When we speak about the recession and the economic crisis, much of the focus is on middle class Americans who have had to cut back on luxuries such as dinners out and vacations. We hear people complaining about having to drive an old car. We speak of people no longer able to send their children to private schools. We talk about "down sizing" for middle class folks.

Rarely is the focus on those living in poverty, those who are impacted most severely by down turns in the economy. We want to speak of those who are living in poverty as "lazy", "unmotivated", and "criminal" in order to distance ourselves from the possibility of ever falling into such dire economic circumstances.

Saturday, October 16, 2010

Allen West: Not Your Typical Tea Party Candidate; He's Down With Crime

I hate to be stereotypical, but when it comes to black republicans they're almost one in the same. I mean you see one black republican and you've seen them all, right? You know, the usual nose in the air, and tightly clenched butt cheek as they navigate their created altered reality which doesn't include one drop of racism? You know, because all men are created equal, and of the color of their skin is never a problem within the meritocracy?

Well, in an attempt to dispel racial stereotypes, in steps Republican nominee for congress, Allen West. Now looking an West pictured above, he looks to be a natural jig master as are pretty much all black republican political hopefuls, and or elite (read: Michael Steele). But, as the old saying "never judge a sellout by his skin color," comes some very damaging info about this darling of the Tea Party down in Florida's 22nd District.

According to an NBC news report, West has close ties to a well known biker gang. And no, we're not talking the Hell's Angels, but instead Outlaws Motorcycle [website]. I've never heard of them before, but apparently they're well known across the nation. Enough so to be the target of an FBI investigation for their involvement in racketeering, "violent crimes", and "attempted murder". You know, good company for any politician.

This from NBC's Lisa Meyers:

Friday, October 15, 2010

TSA Debaucle & Douche Bags

“It is weakness rather than wickedness which renders men unfit to be trusted with unlimited power.” John Adams, 1788

by Eco.Soul.Intellectual

As I was coming off of a blissful wedding weekend, I was irritated by the boys and girls in blue. Nope, not the police this time; but those damn law enforcement rejects who stand at the mammagram machines at airports.

Mu'fucking T-S-A employees who act like peons attempting to use their ounce of power because they hate on people who can actually get on a plane and leave the city. Travel mu'fucka, travel!

"Assholes Following Orders" is a better title for these sadistic, lap-dogs. All of that unsecurity made me miss my plane.

I thought security is supposed to make you feel safe, not dehumanize you?

When I recently flew out of LAX, I was patted down like I had on a burqa and a ticking sound under my clothes. All I had on was a skirt and a bandana to keep my hair tied down (I'mma black woman what do you expect).

Next time I fly, I'll go barefoot while wearing a thong and some plastic nipple pasties.

With the new "threat" of travelers the check in at airports are nothing short of a pap smear or testicular exams. Might as well say, "Breathe, the spatula will be a little cold" or "Cough".

And the validation that they sell the public is that they are keeping the airports safer. So folks agree to being violated in the public. That is not what being an American citizen, or in fact, a human, is about.

Real Quick Story.

Domestic Violence Awareness Month: Is this Domestic Violence? And could it happen to you?

By JuJuBe (Joanna)

This is probably the hardest blog post I have ever written. But, it is a story I need to tell.

I have always been the type of person to see the good in every individual I come across. I try not to hold a person’s past against them. I try to be open minded and accepting of people who the rest of society sees as irredeemable. And, at one point that really got me in trouble.

When I was 19 years old, I met a man named Gary. He was one of the most handsome men I had ever met. He and I got along great, and we became quick friends. Every day I would leave my house early in the morning, head over to pick up Gary, and we would spend hours hanging out in my car, smoking weed, and driving from house to house to visit friends. Even though he had a suspended license, I always asked him to drive, because I had just gotten my license a few months earlier. It never seemed to be an issue.

Being the “sucker for love” that I am, I fell for Gary. Of course. But, he made it a point to tell me that he was used to being with only the hottest women, and could never be my man. But, I was good enough to perform sexual favors for him when no one else was around. And, since I had only had one boyfriend prior to meeting Gary, I thought that was enough. I thought it made me special. I mean, after all, he was the type of man every woman dreams of hooking up with. Plus he had a body to die for.

Gary confided in my that his most recent girlfriend had just had his baby. She was 17 years old, and had moved to Florida, so he had never had the opportunity to see his brand new daughter. The parents of his ex would not allow him to have any contact with their daughter, or with his own child. I really felt for him.

The Friday Sex Blog [Unnatural Acts]


There’s very little more certain than the natural urge to express our sexuality. Almost as reliable as that urge is the societal urge to censor these expressions. I have written before about the more than 2,000-year Christian war against sexuality. I believe sexual censorship is founded on the fear that it is in our sexuality is the strongest power leading toward personal liberation.

Who reading this can honestly say they have never had a deeply moving experience during sex (any kind of sex)?

Let me start off by noting that sexual activities between consenting adults are restricted and carry extreme legal punishments. Until 1961, all fifty states had criminal laws against various forms of consensual sex between unmarried adults. While it is true that many of these laws were repealed during the seventies, as recently as 1997, twenty five states -- half the states in the union -- still have laws on the books criminalizing unmarried cohabitation. Fornication, defined as sex between unmarried couples, and “sodomy,” defined as oral and/ or anal intercourse, are illegal.

What do these really mean? In eleven states around the country, married couples who engage in oral or anal sex in the privacy of their own homes are committing a criminal act, usually a felony. In Rhode Island, an unmarried man and woman engaging in anal sex can receive anywhere from seven to twenty years in prison. In Michigan, two women were sent to prison for enjoying oral sex in the privacy of their tent in a state park. In South Carolina, “the abominable crime of buggery” (not defined in the statute) is punishable by five years in prison. You might think that these are old laws that remain on the books because they haven’t been questioned and you would be wrong. In 1986 the Supreme Court ruled that same sex couples engaging in “sodomy” don’t have a constitutional right to privacy, upholding Georgia state laws in which consensual oral or anal sex between same-sex couples is a felony.

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Should the Government Tell Me How to Spend my Food Stamps?



by JuJuBe (Joanna)

After reading several articles about food stamps in the past few days, I noticed a pattern in the comment sections following each story. And the majority of the
comments were very derogatory towards food stamp program participants.

Apparently, the general public believes that since food stamps are funded by tax payer money, they government should be allowed to act as a pseudo parent and put restrictions on what food stamp recipients can purchase with their EBT cards.

Recently, Mayor Bloomberg announced that he wants to prohibit food stamp recipients from purchasing soda with their benefit cards. Apparently, poor people are children who need the benevolent hand of the government to tell them what they should and should not be eating.

Food stamps can be used for food and non alcoholic beverages. Soda IS a beverage, like it or not. While I do not advocate that an individual go out and spend his entire food stamp budget on soda and sugary snacks, poor people have JUST AS MUCH right to make poor food choices. And, despite what people want to believe, most food stamps are used to purchase NECESSARY food items, NOT snacks and sodas.

I have been on food stamps for 7 years. If it were not for food stamps, I would be forced to eat ramen noodles for three meals a day every day. I use my food stamps to purchase fresh vegetables, lean meats, beans, eggs, bread and milk. And, on occasion, a bottle of soda. Should that small pleasure that I derive from a carbonated beverage once in a while be taken away from me simply because I am poor?

Tribal Wives: Is this Entertainment or Ethnocentrism?



By Joanna (JuJuBe)

In my travels across the internet, I recently came across some youtube videos from the BBC, from a 2008 show called "Tribal Wives". The basic premise of the show is that a British (white) woman would leave her life behind for a month and join a "tribal" culture to document and experience every day life in a different cultural setting. I had not seen this show before, and until today, had not even heard of it. But, from the clips I have seen, I am pretty appalled. It is just another in a long line of culturally exploitative programs designated to degrade and demean non "Western" people.

Each of the clips I watched seem to be dedicated to exploiting exploring the "otherness" of "tribal" cultures. Supposedly, the show is about learning the customs of other groups of people, but from what I can see, it is more about showing how "primitive" and "misguided" the featured cultures are. One video emphasized wife beating. Another addressed forced child marriage. Yet another addressed female circumcision.

Beneath each of the commentaries offered on each of the clips runs an undercurrent of disrespect for the cultural traditions of the people involved. The show is filmed from a 100% Eurocentric perspective, and every custom highlighted is compared to the supposedly more "enlightened" British practices. Some of the British participants tried to question the love that the parents had for their children simply because they participated in cultural traditions that are not approved by "Westerners".

Perhaps there should be a show where individuals from other cultures come to observe and comment on "Western" ideals and behavior. I wonder how they would feel about the sexualization of little girls in beauty pageants? Or the fact that many "Western" children are raised by nannies OR by the boob tube instead of by their parents?

Reality television is one of the most popular forms of entertainment today. And a lot of reality television is based on "cultural tourism". A Western (usually white) individual invades the space of a "traditional" (usually non white) culture, pretends to be "appreciating" the vastly different way of life, and instead is actually reinforcing the notion of the inferiority of others.

Take for example Bizarre Foods with Anthony Zimmern. The title alone is enough to discern the impetus behind this sort of program. Take a white man, inject him into a new (usually non white) culture, and have him emphasize the "strangeness", the "otherness" of the traditions practiced (in this case food). Add some grimaces and dry heaves for effect, and you have an accurate portrayal of how white folks look upon other cultures with disdain.

These sorts of programs are less about learning and appreciating cultural diversity among the people of the world and more about elevating "Western" (white) traditions above all others. They are produced in a way that makes them seem more akin to documentaries about wildlife than about human beings. The emphasis is on what "Westerners" see as "strange" or "primitive" rather than on the lives, loves, feelings and thoughts of real, living, breathing human beings who happen to participate in their own cultural traditions!

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Chilean Miner Rescue, Elvis, & Diversity

I didn't watch the coverage of the epic rescue of the Chilean miners last night. Well, actually I tried to watch it, but it gave  me a weird but creepy Geraldo-Al Capone's vault vibe so I changed the channel. But I'm happy for those dudes, and I'm glad they were able to reunite with their families and side-piece-jumpoffs.

From what little coverage I did see (all ten minutes of it), I remember one of the happy commentators mention that these guys will never go hungry with all the free meals they'll receive in Chile. And I understand, and I agree with that. Shit, after spending 70 days in a matchbox 5000 miles underground just on the north-side of hell. The least anyone could do is buy them a beer while out at the local pub, no?

I mean, not being able to at least masturbate for 70 days because of 32 other dudes in the room has to come with some form of reward. So yeah, these guys are gonna be receiving all sort of congratulatory gifts. Which is cool considering that those miners aren't gonna be paid for their employer for their time while trapped. So yeah, I say they should at least get a lap-dance or whatever they want like the guys in the movie Armageddon.

Speaking of which, I heard that one of those miners received an invitation to Graceland here in Memphis, TN. Supposedly he's a huge Elvis fan and as Kevin Kern spokesman for Elvis Presley Enterprises put it, "A trip to Graceland in Memphis could be just the escape he needs after such a long period of time underground." This might be true, but this is ultimately nothing but PR work for Elvis and Company to promote Graceland.

Alvin Greene (The Gift That Keeps Giving): "DeMint Started the Recession." [VIDEO]

Oh Alvin, I missed you, bro! Yes, you did try this time to come off and be perceived as the "politician" unlike the idiot savant everyone thinks you to be; and for that, you get an "A" for effort from me, my man.


Sure you sounded like a broken black G.I. Joe toy as you repeated your talking points. But you've improved Alvin! Yes, you've come a long way, baby; and you should be proud of yourself. You're still the one Alvin... bless your heart.

Guest Blogger: Spiritual Confessions (by Southern Legal Diva)

[Editors Note: One of the joys of social networking for me, has to be the the ability to "meet" new people, new voices, and new bloggers. Such was the case recently upon the discovery of the blog Confessions of a Legal Diva. A blog presented with a certain freshness and honesty with a splash of virginesque.]

I have been searching for something. You know what it feels like to be looking for something....never knowing what it is. I am at a crossroads with my spiritual life. For years, it has been based on everything and everyone around me. Today I draw the line in the sand. I have to do this on my own.

Religion and spirituality in the black community has always been something that has made me sit up and take notice. In my opinion, it lacks genuineness. This is based not only on my own experiences, but also the experiences of friends and family members. Here are my reasons below:

#1: There is an almost bullying into Christianity.

Most black people start going to church right out of the womb. Somewhere around age 9, there is a subtle pushing towards joining the church. By age 13, you will be reminded nearly everyday that you are not a member of Hold My Mule While I Shout Missionary Baptist AME Zion Church. In my hometown, our local paper publishes a bio of every high school graduate. It contains awards and accomplishments of the graduating senior, where they plan to go to college, parents' names….and what church they are a member of. At 17 I had still not been baptized (I know….the horror!) My mother pushed me for a whole year to join my home church so that there will be something to say about it in the paper. Ummm….what?! It was then that I realized joining the church is more like a social stage of life, a coming out party of sorts where you present yourself to the world as a Christian. I take my faith a little more seriously than that. There is a problem when you force young people into accepting Christ at an age when they don't really know what all that entails. You end up with a generation of adults that think just because they got dipped in water, they are free and clear with the Lord. I don't subscribe to that kind of behavior. I know that there are some people that accept Christ early and lead the life that they are supposed to. But often times….youth and the process of growing up overshadows your faith unless you have more guidance than "join the church!"

Apture

wibiya widget

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails